src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
The citizens of the United States will be paying to clean up the collapse of the real estate bubble. It doesn't matter if one participated in the housing boom or not - we are all going to pay and pay dearly for this mess. Renters, owners and speculators are all equally on the hook if they are taxpayers (did you know that 40% of people living in the U.S. pay or owe no federal income tax?).
Now it is true that those who go through a foreclosure or bankruptcy will have much stress and will take a big hit on their credit score. Those who avoided the bubble, have paid off their house in full and/or don't look at their home as an investment but rather a place to live won't have to deal with these stressors, assuming they don't become a victim of unemployment in the months ahead.
But make no mistake about it, a big chunk of the losses from the housing bubble are going to be put on the taxpayer's tab. The first round of the "bailout ball" was forced upon the unsuspecting American citizenry by Hanky Panky Paulson and his crew to "save the world" from a certain and horrible economic death. The second and third rounds will involve similar sums of money but will come from different angles.
First and most obvious is the number of bank bailouts that the FDIC, and thus the American people, will need to fund. The FDIC will absolutely tap its new $500 billion line of credit from the U.S. Treasury. To pretend otherwise is silly and/or dishonest, as hundreds of additional banks are going to fail before this fiasco is over. In the linked article above, Sheila Bair is quoted as saying:
"Marking banking assets to market prices doesn't make sense."
No, of course it doesn't make sense. Telling the truth and doing the rational and responsible thing would immediately bankrupt our entire banking system overnight. It is much better to pretend that you haven't lost any money on any of the assets you have and instead tell people that they are still worth what you paid for them, even if their value has been reduced to zero. This is our government-banker keiretsu hard at work discouraging reality, honesty and integrity. If the head of the FDIC feels this way, there is no hope for improved transparency of bank balance sheets and no realistic way to fairly value these banking firms (Stay away! Sell!).
In the mean time, these bank "assets" are trending towards zero or less than zero (in the case of some derivative instruments and homes that have gone through severe "trash outs"), which means that when the FDIC finally does step in, it will cost U.S. taxpayers much more than biting the bullet and bailing out these banks now. All the profits for bankers are and will remain privatized but any and all of the big losses will be put on the taxpayer's tab as much as possible. The larger banks are not stupid and have found a way to try to salvage some extra profits out of this mess (in addition to being able to stay in business) by asking their pre-bought bureaucrats to jump into the shark pool.
This is where the second of the two remaining big components of the government housing bailout comes into play. This is even more nefarious than the direct bank bailouts. It has to do with Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, the FHA and Ginnie Mae. These institutions are now guaranteeing 90% of new home loans generated in this country, including the refinancing and modification of loans gone bad. Why make lots of loans in the middle of a real estate collapse? Oh yeah, I forgot - it's because all the inevitable losses will just be put on the taxpayer's tab, so who cares?
This is, in essence, a transfer of toxic loans from private balance sheets to the government balance sheet. Underwriting standards have been subprime and lax for these new government-sponsored loans. Private mortgage originators are going hog wild signing up anyone with a pulse who still wants to buy a house (Don't buy - rent!) if they can meet the government standards because these originators know they can turn around and pass the hot potato onto the government, making a profit/commission in the process.
In the mean time, these loans are already going bad at a alarming rate akin to subprime loans. Capital reserves are dangerously low at the government sponsored entities and rapidly declining, which means more taxpayer money will be needed down the road to bail these quasi-companies out (don't believe articles like this where officials say they won't need extra funding - they will). The low down payments and lax lending standards required for many home loans are what helped get us into trouble in the first place and I would hazard a guess that many of the home owners partaking of these new toxic government loans are going to be close to underwater by the time the ink dries on the final loan documents.
This scheme is also why private banks are ignoring overdue debtors for up to 2 years without finishing the foreclosure process. Not only have Sheila Bair and other apparatchik ilk encouraged private banks to avoid taking losses by allowing banks to keep home loans on the books as assets with an inflated and unrealistic value to bolster their balance sheet and make them look vaguely solvent, but the other part of the plan for banks is to stall while trying to find a way to get their toxic loans onto the books of Uncle Sam and the American taxpayer. They will find a way, believe me.
The private, non-federal, for-profit federal reserve corporation is warming up to the scam and moving things along nicely by purchasing large amounts of commercial and residential mortgage debt. This, of course, will all be foisted onto the taxpayer tab at the opportune time. When this occurs, it will sold as "an investment," but this will be yet another cruel joke on the American people.
So, in the end, it's all coming together for many bankers. The housing and commercial real estate collapse continues unabated and the bill is increasingly going to be put on the U.S. taxpayer's tab, allowing many bankers to get off scot-free and pocket some dough in the process. This moral hazard Uncle Sam is creating ensures more risk-taking and speculation in a real estate market the government has no business encouraging people to speculate in right now. It also absolutely guarantees an even bigger disaster down the road for Uncle Sam's balance sheet. Privatizing gains and socializing losses - damn it feels good to be a banksta!
Such moral hazard also encourages debtors to just walk away from any bad housing debts. When people aren't paying their mortgage, they rarely will make property tax payments, so this federal government interference/moral hazard and willful banker neglect of past due loans will also impact local governments tremendously. It is likely that these local governments will try to squeeze some blood out of a stone by asking those left standing who either own their homes or still pay their mortgage to pay higher property taxes. Being financially responsible increasingly means being asked to bend over and accept higher taxes and/or currency debasement while feeling "left out" of the debtor party.
Many citizens support the government "stabilizing" housing prices based on self interest. Yet such folks don't realize that government can only waste money while making things worse for the whole country and not doing anything but prolonging the pain that has to happen to allow the market to heal. Bad debts must be liquidated, not hidden or subsidized. Government cannot "stabilize" housing, but they can put lots of toxic liabilities on the taxpayer tab while the real estate market proceeds lower to the same levels it was going to go anyway.
Unfortunately, all of this government interference does mean that housing will take longer to find its true bottom - I think we're looking at 2014 or later. It also means that the government debt load is going to increase astronomically over the next few years (what's a few extra trillion, eh?), almost ensuring a serious currency dislocation at some point down the road. Be sure to watch with feigned amusement when the apparatchiks tell you in a year or two that no one saw it coming as the next bailout is announced or a currency crisis/capital flight rears its ugly head. Home sweet home, my ass. We're all going to pay for the housing mess - one way or the other.
16 comments:
True... true.
we already paid for it and are going to continue to pay for it.
Yes, unfortunately it doesn't seem like you can avoid paying for the mess if you rent or own.
A friend of a friend lives on very little money, living on an anchored boat (not in a marina) - and therefore pays no property taxes.
Of course, if the currency collapses and the U.S. defaults on its debt, the tab will simply be paid by China et. al. Silly them for buying U.S. debt! But I think they're realizing it, and extricating themselves very, very carefully.
Sorry to be off topic but this may be of interest. Seems the big playahs are shorting gold. I wonder who will come out on top, the house or regular folks? I usually don't bet against the house.
http://futures.tradingcharts.com/cotcharts/GD
Adam - I'm not sure you read comment I made at the previous article:
"Another factoid that I just noticed - this breakout happened almost precisely after pi*100 (3141) hours after Armstrong's last turn date of 19th April '09."
@Anonymous:
I wouldn't worry about that too much if I were long. Large short positions by "commercials" (read: bullion banks) are, in fact, a favorable - even necessary - condition prior to significant breakouts. Increasing short positions are bearish during a continuing uptrend, but fantastically bullish at breakout points. In fact, the greater the short positions, the more spectacular the breakout will be.
Geoff,
> the tab will simply be paid by
> China et. al.
China owns 2 trillion of the 15 trillion government debt. That's only 13%. The people who should really be worried are the guys who funded the other 87% of the government debt (mutual funds, savings banks and pension funds).
2014 is VERY optimistic for a bottom in housing. The average joe still subscribes to this idea that it's ALWAYS a good idea to buy a house. Real estate can only go up, and this is an incredible buying opportunity. This kind of thinking has to be shaken out of the average joe before we get the real bottom in housing. When HGTV is off the air, and the average joe is incredulously asking, "how much lower can houses go?!," then I'll buy a house......with cash.
GG-
Interesting Gold timing info relative to Armstrong.
Geoff-
Yeah, my problem is I like being on the grid rather than off it, but I still want to complain about the grid...
;]
Kevin-
Yes, domestic savers and companies heavily into U.S. debt ironically need to hope for deflation.
Anon2-
See my previous post on COT short positions on the last 2 major Gold rallies.
Anon3-
Maybe its optimistic, but my point is that is WAY TOO MUCH optimism out there among people looking for a bottom, either 'cuz they're underwater or hoping to get a house cheap right now instead of waiting a few more years to see how crazy things are going to get.
Adam,
>Yes, domestic savers and companies
>heavily into U.S. debt ironically
>need to hope for deflation.
I'm not sure how you see this?
What deflation does to a government is shrink its tax incomes. Debt payment obligations don't go down and actually keep rising; debt becomes a heavier burden during deflation.
If this causes the government to default on its debt, the ones paying the bill will be the creditors of the US government. If the government defaults on its debt, 13% of the hurt will be for China. The other 87% of the hurt will be for domestic and foreign savers.
Kevin-
Based only on history. Federal debt (at least the shorter term) denominated in the senior currency tends to hold its value fairly well during deflation. Now if/when we blow out into full-blown "recognized" debt default, no one wins. However, deflation means a relatively strong U.S. Dollar and bond prices remain relatively high for longer than most people think can happen right now despite ballooning gov't debt (a la Japan).
Think of it like this: if deflation is going to win and history is any guide, would you rather hold stocks, real estate and/or commodities (which many domestic savers and pensions do) or U.S. short-term gov't bonds?
Again, longer-term, I wouldn't want to be heavily weighted in Dollars, but it may be a reasonable place to be for at least the intermediate-term.
I guess it depends on the time frame.
Adam,
Throughout most of history, we've been on a gold standard of some sort. Today the senior currency is a fiat currency. Do you think that makes a difference during deflation?
Kevin-
I guess we'll find out...
;]
All kidding aside, did it matter for Japanese stock investors? It is also harder to default if other countries continue to allow us to borrow more to pay back previous oncurred debt (i.e. default will take longer because we don't have to give up any Gold).
Again, a purist will argue that haven't experienced a true deflationary spiral and this is probably because of differing definitions and/or having a fiat system. I think Japan is a realistic model (to rhyme, not repeat exactly) for U.S.-style deflation, but there's one major problem that cannot be ignored:
This current secular-bear cycle may well see the U.S. Dollar knocked off as the world's reserve currency. Since I am a U.S. investor and my salary and expenses are paid in U.S. Dollars, I am automatically overweight U.S. Dollars just to get through daily activities.
I think we can have a currency devaluation and still have deflation in the asset prices that matter to me (i.e. stocks, corporate bonds, real estate and many commodities). If the U.S. Dollar is dethroned as the reserve currency of the world, there will absolutely be a period of international economic chaos that will favor Gold as the international currency of choice.
Remember that I am a pragmatic speculator and investor more than an economist. I care about "symptoms" of deflation such as declining stock and real estate prices, not winning the debate on academic economics that cannot be traded.
Who's right and who's wrong will ultimately be decided by who makes money and who loses their savings. In that sense, the two are intimately entwined.
One thing you're failing to mention in the future inflation/deflation argument is that the IMF, UN, and of course the USA and UK are all pushing hard for a new international reserve currency based on SDRs. In fact, they have already published numerous reports since the crisis began blaming every currency speculator and bank for this crisis instead of blaming their own fiscal policies which pumped tons of fiat currency into the global economy.
The IMF is selling gold, China is buying it all, and eventually we'll see a new global hedge of declining dollars and pounds against increasing currencies from the BRIC.
Once the dollar's growth is hedged against the yuan's gain, the Fed can go back to printing money to their heart's content while the Chinese can maintain "cheap" monetary policy to maintain their exports.
At the end of the day, I doubt we'll see the huge currency crisis that everyone is predicting for a LONG time. The people in control have removed every barrier on their way to socialization of the global economy and that's clearly their goal if you read anything they have published over the past year.
Markets have been irrational since 1973 and I doubt that is changing anytime soon. Those who argue for deflation in the near future are underestimating the influence of central reserve banking.
Hello and thank you very much for your post. I entirely agree with you and must admit that I feel quite alarmed about the situation in the US. If people don't make their minds and stop taking more and more loans, we will never get out of this situation.
Take care,
Jay
Post a Comment